Friday, March 18, 2011

addendum to a citizen's state of the union

clip taken from campaignforliberty


On Thursday, March 17, 2011, Congressman Ron Paul spoke on the U.S. House floor in support of legislation to bring troops home from Afghanistan by December 31, 2011.

Thursday, March 10, 2011

a citizen's state of the union

THE IMMEDIATE ISSUE affecting each american and every citizens of the world, is the united states illegal occupation, which some erroneously refer to as wars, in the both distant theaters of afghanistan and iraq. the simultaneous seizure of these sovereign nations by the u.s. military and its select contractors, is explicitly unconstitutional, unethical, unsustainable furthermore, un-winnable. these compelling reasons, should move conscious citizens to deliberate action in protest to crimes committed abroad in our name, under our flag. the consequences of inaction is the burdensome responsibility of blood guilt. yes, blood on our hands. for people are dying, not tempestuous terrorists, nor enigmatic evil-doers, but real people - red blooded as you or i, everyday and it will not end, until we demand it cease!
 
a patriot's duty is to the rule of law. it is unpatriotic to support an unconstitutional or otherwise illegal act of government, including war. article i, section 8, clause 11 of the u.s. constitution, states:


[congress shall have power...] to declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water;

no auxiliary code supersedes the law, as it is written, in the u.s. constitution. in order to change the laws within, the constitution must be either amended or abolished. congress never declared war on either afghanistan or iraq. therefore, the conflicts on both fronts cannot justifiably be labeled as wars, nor funded as such. complicit in the perpetration of the bush/obama administration's prosecution of afghanistan and iraq is the mainstream press, who attempt to validate these illegalities by referring to them legitimately as wars, so too congress.

congress, for some time, has failed in its responsibility to declare wars. all u.s. military adventures, post world war ii, have been unconstitutional, undeclared conflicts, with ambiguous ends, no clear exit strategies much less decisive victories. our current engagements in the middle east are one of the longest, costliest military entanglements in american history.

if the congress, the executive and the judicial branches of our government do not keep to their constitutional oaths of office, to preserve the constitution, then the responsibility falls to us, the people. as citizens, it is our duty, to "preserve, protect and defend" to "support and defend" the constitution, the same as any elected official, through civil means, namely, our fundamental rights of expression; speech, assembly, protest and vote. else-wise, we are a nation of lawless traitors who have acquiesces our responsibilities and rights to fascist lobbyists who have, in so many ways, bought our representatives.

the economic crisis that has devastated the u.s., is only compounded when we continue to support through our voice, vote and wallet, the illegal occupations of middle eastern lands. as tax payers, where is the outrage? hundreds of billions of our dollars are being wasted literally while unemployment and foreclosures continue with no end in view.

the proposed budget cuts of 6-60 billion dollars, by democrats and republicans respectfully, are equally unconscionable when put into perspective of our increasing trillion dollar deficit. however, washington continues to play partisan politics which effectively steal attention from real budget issues, the same as they have so stealthily stolen our wealth. defense, health care, trade, energy and banking are the issues! period. starting with defense and military troops abroad. they must come home, immediately! the fact that neither side is approaching the problem  seriously with solutions in mind, demonstrates to me one of two possibilities, absolute ineptness which i doubt, or what's more probable, absolute collusion or colloquially speaking, corruption. 

the occupation, as it has continued for near a decade, is systematically defrauding the people of the united states out of our character, blood, treasure and reputation, not to the benefit of any people here or there, but into the pockets of war profiteers. end the occupations, demand it.

Friday, February 11, 2011

in recognition of egypt

i was so inspired by the events of today, the willpower of the egyptian people to affect change, non-violently, on such a large scale to force the resignation of president hosni mubarak, that i felt it i would post a simple piece of poetry i have composed in their honor. it shall also serve as an introduction into the subject of freedom, which i plan to explore in the wake on egypt's revolution.


catharsis


congruent, conscientious commaraderie continues clear, cross countries, capitols, cosmopolitan cities, communities congregate, celebrate compassionate charity, counter-culture contraries cry, “counter-establishment!”, conceptualization comes closer corporeality, circle complete.


to the people of egypt and revolutionaries across the earth.

Monday, February 7, 2011

interventionism

interesting discussion, of two furthermore interesting personalities, noam chomsky and william f. buckley, circa 1969, concerning u.s. foreign policy in particular terrorism, interventionism and imperialism, which applies mightily to 21st century world events.



Sunday, January 9, 2011

something must be done

today was like any other and all those come before it. a day of comedies. a day of tragedies. the sun rose and fell, like the metaphor for life, it is. all is ephemeral, passing from comedy to tragedy. today, tragedy befell a parking lot in tucson. in a despicable act of cowardice, a 22 year old gunman killed six and wounded twelve others including rep. gabrielle giffords. for good reason, the shooting has sparked outrage. and there has been a significant amount of outrage, concerning sarahpac, whose campaign painted a violent image of targeted districts, including rep. giffords', within literal cross-hairs. i have read the reaction across the internet. the sum of which is, "something must be done."


"something must be done." that is perhaps the most dangerous statement to the wellness of a free society. as horrible and inhumane as the campaign is, as unfortunate as the tragedy it has allegedly inspired as a consequence, it is freedom of speech. irresponsible, yes ... but freedom nonetheless. something must be done? what must be done? problem: the message of sarahpac has inspired bloodshed. reaction: something must be done. solution: legislation named after rep. giffords which perhaps, limits free speech. the result is, at first, satifactory, because "something" has been done. but is it the right thing? will such a solution be satisfactory, the day after tomorrow? consider the bloodshed, the lives lost in the name of instituting and protecting said freedoms. should not "something" be clearly defined, before it is exclaimed? elsewise, is it not irresponsible speech, the same as that which spurred the hegelian reaction? because "something" could mean anything.